Diasfora

General Category => TV / Movies => Topic started by: 8ullfrog on May 17, 2013, 01:41:04 AM

Title: Into Darkness.
Post by: 8ullfrog on May 17, 2013, 01:41:04 AM
ChekovSulu would be on the edge of his seat for this one. It's a hard film to discuss without massive bless'ed spoilers. Like when Chekov *Gasp* or when Sulu [REDACTED] Seriously, I'm having trouble thinking of things to say that AREN'T major spoilers. Bones gets like, five or six of them on his own!

The film goes out of it's way to tell you that NO ONE is safe, but it does not do so in a cliched "Main character gets shot through the head" way.

I will say this, my worries about the female science officer being a damsel in distress were dismissed, she fought as best she could, and ANYONE would scream from a kick like she takes.

The visuals were once again striking, and they majorly cut abrams lens filter budget.

One thing I do need to say that may be a spoiler to some is that the fighting is BRUTAL. No clean antiseptic camera shakes like on the television series. That being said, no one is killed by a randomly exploding bridge console. My guess is that this incarnation of Starfleet invested in surge protectors.

One thing they brought up but was never resolved or commented on, something was medically wrong with Kirk. Bones brings it up before a mission and is dismissed, it never comes up again.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: 8ullfrog on May 17, 2013, 02:25:57 AM
My shoulder was crushed by the person I went to the film with when the dun dun dun went down.

I bless'ed hated the tribble, but recognize why they put it in there (For the stupid).

Still, when my biggest complaint is a single Tribble, the movie is awesome.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: Autumn on May 17, 2013, 05:14:32 AM
So it's about aliens?

Edit: I just saw another post and realized its a Star Trek movie... Interest lost.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: 8ullfrog on May 17, 2013, 05:43:45 AM
How open minded.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: Autumn on May 17, 2013, 05:53:59 AM
I feel like you see one, you've seen them all.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: 8ullfrog on May 17, 2013, 06:11:05 AM
Which Star Trek movie did you watch?
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: ohcheap1 on May 17, 2013, 09:20:14 PM
Spoiler (hover to show)

And like every single character in the movie:
(http://www.the-king-tom.com/blog/img/singletear.jpg)
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: 8ullfrog on May 17, 2013, 09:37:29 PM
This isn't the spoiler thread :P
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: dweez on May 17, 2013, 11:34:23 PM
This isn't the spoiler thread :P

I threw spoiler tags around it.  If I caught some that wasn't spoiler, I apologize but haven't not seen the movie yet, I've been avoiding these topics and didn't read it.

If I could figure out how to move oc1's post to the spoiler thread 8ully started, I would have...I feel so dumb.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: 8ullfrog on May 17, 2013, 11:44:39 PM
Wow, that's a mod stress I never even thought existed. How the golly are you supposed to avoid spoilers when dealing with spoilers? IT IS MADNESS.

Also I am totally sad at how dismissive autumn is of this film. So sad.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: Autumn on May 18, 2013, 01:19:50 AM
don't be sad! it's just a movie. perhaps I'll end up watching it anyway.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: tarascon on May 18, 2013, 06:57:30 AM
I remember the trauma of missing the original series which was on TV at the ungodly hour of 8:00. Because of that, and the adult fare (i.e. women in mini-skirts), I wasn't allowed to watch it. I grew up in a very old school European home. My friends didn't and they got to watch the show... So, I grew up with nothing but Star Trek spoilers without the benefit of seeing the show until it was in circulation around 1972.
Perhaps that explains why I am the perennial outsider I am. lol
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: smokester on May 20, 2013, 05:08:31 AM
If I could figure out how to move oc1's post to the spoiler thread 8ully started, I would have...I feel so dumb.

The only way to do it via this software, would be to cut it out and merge it with the other thread.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: ohcheap1 on May 20, 2013, 06:58:43 AM
Geez.....I posted nothing that even resembled a spoiler. Retentive much?
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: 8ullfrog on May 20, 2013, 07:14:55 AM
Benedict Cumberbatch's Character name as stated is JOHN HARRISON.

This is not a spoiler.

<Spoiler snipped> DURRR, me dumb.
Title: Re: Into Darkness.
Post by: Autumn on May 20, 2013, 04:42:44 PM
i had to laugh out loud at oc1's post... toooooo funny.