Diasfora
General Category => TV / Movies => Topic started by: Maudibe on January 19, 2014, 12:21:49 PM
-
nuff said
-
nuff said
+ 1 to that
(even though the second film is marginally better than the first, it's still a disappointment)
Like 6pairsofshoes mentioned somewhere, I'd rather rely on my imagination and not have the film mess with my memories of the book.
-
While I sort of enjoyed watching it while it was playing, afterwards I did wonder why they had made a movie over 2.5 hours long that could have been done in 11 minutes, possibly 12.
And where was the 'desolation'?
-
While I sort of enjoyed watching it while it was playing, afterwards I did wonder why they had made a movie over 2.5 hours long that could have been done in 11 minutes, possibly 12.
And where was the 'desolation'?
It was self-referential. Film title as film criticism... :o
-
As a film go's, it entertained.
I put films into distinct categories, this was a entertaining film with no thought required.
Was a children's book to begin with.
-
Nope.
Was one third of a children's book to begin with
really , what was the other 2/3 thirds.
Edited to quote christ's post. You all know they tend to dissapear. ;)
-
really , what was the other 2/3 thirds
The next two.... well now one more crappy movie to be released
-
Actually as per the thread title
So the Hobbit sucks what do you think?
The Hobbit, or There and Back Again is the book title.
The Hobbit - An Unexpected Journey
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
The Hobbit: There and Back Again are the film titles.
-
-
I'm not gonna lie. It eased the pain of folding laundry. I paid attention to it the third time I watched it I think.
-
Thank you, Maudibe. I instinctively stayed away from that movie, and this trailer confirms my suspicions with the best possible humor.